Plot Synopsis
Group A:
- All-in play should not be tampered with at all.
- Selective all-in play can be used highly effectively.
- Doesn’t mind playing against always all-in players.
- Suggests that since it is a consistent, deliberate action that it can be defined as a strategy in the loosest sense of the word.
Group B:
- Some do want administrative action against this type of play, some do not.
- Is against always all-in players, but most are not against selective all-in players.
- Finds always all-in play annoying and disruptive.
- Suggests that since it requires no depth of thought that it cannot be defined as a strategy.
Group C:
- Can we stop debating semantics and just play poker?