OUCH!!!
High ranked player, far from the money, is getting blinded out of a low stakes tourney but he keeps folding and folding. Finally with less than 2 BBâs he goes all-in and gets 4 callers. Flop come 774.
You guessed itâŚhe had 74o and flopped a boat multiplying his stack by 5. Suddenly heâs the hot seat, hitting nut straights and flushes every 2nd or 3rd hand. He finishes well into the money.
He folds all those hands and raises on 74o like he was waiting for that hand, then starts filling inside straights and river flushes.
Things that make you go hmmmm.
Actually my goal was to squander first my entire patrimony and then quit. Now I found out that not even wasting my millions is fun.
I simply canât bear any more the predictability of Replayâs software, the recurrent patterns, the juiced hands etc. Sorry!
Many can live with it and find other sources of enjoyment. I canât, because poker is an important part of my presence at Replay.
So I say bye to all the lovely people I met here, in particular to my âsistersâ, and wish you all the best for your life.
You know how to keep in touch with me, if you like.
Donât go miri.
Iâm hanging here by a thread and youâre one of the fun ones.
I rarely post in the forum, but the light will be dimmed here if you leave. Please listen to Whittaker and your friends. Believe me the grass is not greener elsewhere
Hear hear!
Miri, 2 things:
First, if you want to squander your millions, you should just give them to me!!!
Second, even if poker is an important part of your presence at Replay, and you donât think itâs worth it anymore, please do stay for the other parts. Neither the site nor the forums would be the same without you!
Although Iâm Roman, I am not the sort of person who likes dramatic gestures, like, for example, Sophia Loren who, when she was rightly charged for tax evasion, solemnly declared on TV: I shall NEVER put my foot on Italian soil again, you ungrateful country!
I didnât mean to say: you donât deserve me, you ungrateful site! Because they might justly say: be silent, you goose! We are offering you an entertainment for free!
And I was certainly not catching for appeals to stay. I was just taking leave of all my friends here.
Now, though, Replay is refusing to deactivate my account. I tried twice and twice I got the message: you canât deactivate your account while you are playing at a table or in a tourney. But I am not!
Is this a sign? LOL
Well, instead of asking the support for help, Iâll stop playing for a while. Who knows? Maybe Iâll learn to accept the flaws âphilosophicallyâ, or perhaps the flaws may disappear.
Some people might think âyes, they would be much better.â
Are they the people whose opinion you actually care about though?
You mean the people who make us cry the whole night long? Of course I care, I look sooo horrible in the morning!
why did you block the debate
I hear ya there. think Iâm just gonna stop and just chat to friends on here.
miri123 you are dead on about this site it has gotten so bad Iâm going try to dump 12mil
Cigar, I actually LOVE this site. I am simply disappointed, but I still hope they are going to make some changes. If not, so be it.
LOL - how many 6âs are actually in the deck? 250K MTT - pay no attention to the actual level of play or youâll get a headache: https://www.replaypoker.com/hand/replay/458051686
maybe should start a thread on âunusual or unlikely handsâ?
Adding this one: OK, 6âs are the hot item tonight so whatever you do, donât fold them! 3-way all-in chop because all players had the 6 for the gutshot - LMAO: https://www.replaypoker.com/hand/replay/458070144 (again, pay no attention to how it got to showdown - UGH!) Yeah, its a goofy result because everyone is passively playing garbage but it still takes an awful lot to set this up and run it out the way it went down.
It continues into the New Year! If you are picking lottery numbers tonight, make sure you take the 6. Here we have 2 identical fullhouses with 6/4 on a flop of 6/4/A and turn 6. LOL, just like we always see everywhere we play. https://www.replaypoker.com/poker_table/4824452/open
Warlock would you agree with the below/please share your opinion more so to say-
1.there are players who i know hit quads and cards in that bracket everyday of the weekâŚand win on them 95% of the time.But frankly they are not good playersâŚpure luck boxesâŚthat also means they win on utter crap cards.
2.those who dont see them for weeks and still win on pure skill and good reads basically grind everyday.
3.and those who hit them regularly and lose on them regularly,just bad luck.
ive seen all 3 above on a regular basis âŚi know of 3 players who just cannot win with best hands such as AA and KK or QQâŚ
So lets assume you say nature of the beastâŚwhich i totally agree withâŚthe reason i agree is we have to battle them every day and its a tough job reallyâŚthere are these few who just win regardless of the hands they holding the flop,turn and river simply flows thier wayâŚnothing strategicâŚ
What im saying also is you cannot percieve these players as skilled players as it may appear that wayâŚ
@jazzbythebay - There are horrible players who win and good players who donât for long stretches of time. I donât know the specifics of the players you are talking about but taking you at your word, sure it can happen the way you say it does. All these things revert to the mean in the long run but the long run can be far longer than most of us are around to observe. There are extremely talented pros who havenât had major cashes in a tournament in years. There are players who win WSOP Main Events who never win another tournament in their lives. I know one particularly horrible player who has somehow owned my soul for about a decade. Iâve put his kids through college by running bad against him. He loses money overall but not against me. Yes, I hate him with a passion.
Poker is brutally unfair, just as life is. There are people who do all the right things who donât succeed and people who do all the wrong things who do. You can either let that bug you or not. Iâve run hotter than the sun at times and colder than a snowmanâs testicles at others. Knowing that its possible to run either way isnât all that comforting when Iâm running bad. Humanâs like to be rewarded for making the right decisions and as far as I know, Iâm human.
GL mate and HNY
thanks my friendâŚyour first line says it allâŚthatâs the issue on hand really âŚdonât know if someone has the algorithim down packed to win everytime they sit at the tables and on the flip side just the person is a degenerated loser for no fault of his inspite understand the game better than most.This is rhetoricalâŚBe it casino or cash games or free chipsâŚim not pointing the difference game play but simply what you saying is blowing hot or coldâŚim saying and reiterate that there are players who donât blow hot or cold they remain a constant enigma on their space of simply winning all the time or losing all the time.
Take the case as you mention WSOP winner/player you talking of Jamie Gold for a case studyâŚwon WSOP hands down with his chip count higher than the remaining 9 combined on the table.He wonjust a little over 12 million in 2006 in the main event and as of 2018 his total winnings are 12.5 million âŚso about US$400,000 in casino/cash games in 12 yearsâŚpathetic for WSOP winnerâŚ
now let me drag you to the replay site and explain to me -A player joined here in Aug 2018 and has amassed 1.2 billion chips thru early December2018âŚso winning about 300 million chips on replay every month four months on the trot.im stating a fact here this is not hypothetical.
Which also means that the winnings went on doubling every month without backtracking any loss so that means never went back 50 million or 100 million just surged ahead arithemetically forward.
Now given the fact the payer is not related to Negranu or Ivey (I take it as surely no) is this even possible ?
I mean if I go with your terms- the payer has never seen a day like a snowmans testicles lolllllllllll
I agree with the brutality,poker is not about sunshine and rainbowsâŚit will beat you down to your knees as quotedâŚThe second part of this post makes skill look stupidâŚ