We’ve all had hot streaks where for a time we’re getting great cards. We make strong hands. We edge out our opponents in showdowns. We hit improbable draws.
After a short time, when you have a hot streak, you win so many chips that you can open your range way up, and start playing with middle connectors, rag pairs, etc. because your stack dominates the table and the blinds have a way to go to catch up to you. If you’re in a 9-seat SNG with half the chips at the table in front of you and the blinds are still <100, you can play almost any two cards, and bully pots when you miss.
If you get too used to it, though, this loose play becomes a liability. All hot streaks come to an end. The odds catch up with you, and you start losing those close showdowns. You bluff one time too many and get called, losing a big pot. You run into a cold streak, getting dealt mostly weak cards and every time you have something that could be playable, you miss the flop. Or you hit the flop, but someone else hits it better.
Your recent hot streak lead to bad habits and lead you directly into a cold streak where the bad cards you’re getting are magnified by the bad decisions you’re making due to the loose, aggressive style you won with when you were getting lots of big cards.
That’s what I mean by “winning a lot makes you a bad player”.
So, now that you know what I mean, how do you avoid falling into this trap?
I find that when I do get a hot streak of unbelievably playable cards and great outcomes, I do change my style to take advantage of this. The cards pretty much demand it, when you get good cards, you should play them.
The problem, I think, is when your range opens up and you start playing too many mediocre starting cards. For a short time, when you’re hot and the table knows it and they’re giving you respect, you can play those mediocre hands and win with them. But that never lasts. It can’t last. So you need to quickly adjust back when you sense that the hot streak is over.
Can you sense when a streak is over? Not really. If the cards really are being dealt fairly, this is just a statistical aberration, not something caused by anything. So you can’t predict, and you can’t notice when a string of random numbers stops being mostly high numbers.
Well, what can you do then? I have my ideas, and I’d tell you, but, well, they’re not working so good. I’m still working on it. I want to hear what you think.